There is no virus, never has been!

[Pixel8r]

Bottom post of the previous page:

[Pixel8r]

Interesting thoughts on the use of Ivermectin to 'cure' the illusion of convid.

[Pixel8r]

Spoken like a true Glaswegian

NO CONTAGION

[Pixel8r]

David gives a very concise explanation of this plandemic and the fact THERE IS NO VIRUS.

DAVID ICKE SPEECH FOR GREAT AWAKENING CELEBRATION CONFERENCE

[Pixel8r]

also posted and removed from YouTube;

[Laura]

Fear fear fear.
Gosh, where did they find the unisolateable convid to smear on?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lei ... e-56171006

University study finds Covid survives three days on fabric

Scientists have found viruses similar to the strain that causes Covid-19 can survive on commonly-worn fabrics for up to three days.

The study by De Montfort University in Leicester tested a model coronavirus on polyester, polycotton and 100% cotton.

The results suggested polyester posed the highest risk.

Microbiologist Dr Katie Laird, who led the study, said the materials, commonly used in healthcare uniforms, posed a transmission risk.

The study saw droplets of the virus added to the fabrics.

The scientists then monitored the stability of the virus on each material for 72 hours.

[Pixel8r]

The virus is a mind virus, that is all IMO.

[Pixel8r]

[Pixel8r]

Thread worth reading;

[Pixel8r]

Interesting that Mike Yeadon has also come out and said that he doesn't think there ever was covid virus!

Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus

By Dr Mike Yeadon - March 22, 2023

I’VE grown increasingly frustrated about the way debate is controlled around the topic of origins of the alleged novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, and I have come to disbelieve it’s ever been in circulation, causing massive scale illness and death. Concerningly, almost no one will entertain this possibility, despite the fact that molecular biology is the easiest discipline in which to cheat. That’s because you really cannot do it without computers, and sequencing requires complex algorithms and, importantly, assumptions. Tweaking algorithms and assumptions, you can hugely alter the conclusions.

This raises the question of why there is such an emphasis on the media storm around Fauci, Wuhan and a possible lab escape. After all, the ‘perpetrators’ have significant control over the media. There’s no independent journalism at present. It is not as though they need to embarrass the establishment. I put it to readers that they’ve chosen to do so.

So who do I mean by ‘they’ and ‘the perpetrators? There are a number of candidates competing for this position, with their drug company accomplices, several of whom are named in Paula Jardine’s excellent five-part series for TCW, Anatomy of the sinister Covid project. High on the list is the ‘enabling’ World Economic Forum and their many political acolytes including Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern.

But that doesn’t answer the question why are they focusing on the genesis of the virus. In my view, they are doing their darnedest to make sure you regard this event exactly as they want you to. Specifically, that there was a novel virus.

I’m not alone in believing that myself at the beginning of the ‘pandemic’, but over time I’ve seen sufficient evidence to cast strong doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d’état, I have put myself in the position of the most senior, hidden perpetrators. In a Q&A, they would learn that the effect of a released novel pathogen couldn’t be predicted accurately. It might burn out rapidly. Or it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, demolishing advanced civilisations. Those top decision-makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is intolerable to them. They crave total control, and the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action: ‘No, we’re not going to do this. Come back with a plan with very much reduced uncertainty on outcomes.’...

[Pixel8r]